quarta-feira, 11 de outubro de 2006

Houzan Mahmoud: «It's not a matter of choice»

«The veil is not merely a piece of "cloth", but a sign of the oppression of women, control over their sexuality, submissiveness to the will of God or a man. The veil is a banner of political Islam used to segregate women born by historical accident in the so-called "Islamic World", from other women in the rest of the world.

###

I could never have imagined having anything in common with Jack Straw, but I find myself in agreement with him about how it feels talking to a woman covered up in hijab or the "niqab" that covers women fully.

However, I think he has discovered this rather late; in fact, the whole British government is late in drawing attention to this growing phenomenon: women covering up their entire bodies, young boys becoming suicide bombers and the ever growing demands of religious organisations in the UK to implement Islamic sharia law when it comes to "Muslim family affairs".

Jack Straw's government has always been proud of its "multicultural society", in which all kinds of backward and anti-human cultures are respected and given space by the state. Women from an Islamic background will be among the most oppressed.

Celebrating "different cultures" the existence of mosques and religious schools is a place for brainwashing the young people with Islamic values which can only produce political Islamists.

A ghettoised lifestyle, isolated communities, lack of integration and institutionalised racism are all part and parcel of this growing number of brain-washed young generations of girls and boys defining themselves by their religious identity.

Political Islamists are seeking to unify youth from a variety of backgrounds around the project of a "jihad" under which the whole world will be dominated and ruled according to the "ethics" of Sharia law.

More than ever I hear many women claiming that wearing the veil, burqa or niqab is their own choice. I totally reject this view. Not wearing the veil can create harsh problems for women - if it doesn't cost them their life, as in Iraq, it can cost them long-term isolation from their community, with those considered "loose women" having less chance of getting a "decent marriage", and less chance of going out and entering education. When a family sees this as a threat to their "honour", it can have disastrous consequences. The policies of cultural relativism have claimed the lives of many women in the UK, with their killers not properly brought to justice because "culture" and "religion" are taken into account by the courts. Women's rights are universal. A criminal must be sentenced according to the law, not on religious and cultural grounds.

Imagine if a girl has been told to wear the veil from as early as four or five years old, where is the choice in this? If you are born and open your eyes in an environment that imposes Islamic values, norms and lifestyles, alienated from the rest of society, how easy is it to make another choice? I understand why girls would veil, but I cannot see it as anything other than a solitary confinement prison.

The government's endless funding to promote religious activities and run religious schools must be ended. We need a secular education system: universal standards must be applied to all schools and educational institutions. I want my daughter to learn about the wealth of human art, literature, music and science, not religion and the joys of "different religious cultures". Children know no colour, race or religious segregation; they are all friends and part of the same community - until parents impose their beliefs on them.

The veil should be banned for under-aged girls and children must be protected from abusive - yes, that is right, abusive - parents who seek to impose their religion on them.

Having a society free from politicised religion is the precondition for women's freedom and progress. In the west where religion has been pushed back and separated from the state, we see women are more free and equal to men as compared to the countries where Islam is dominant.

In Iraq we have witnessed widespread terror and violence against women who refuse to wear the veil. In Iraq the veil is being imposed at gunpoint - the only choice women are offered is to obey.

In Iran women are lashed or sometimes stoned to death for expressing their simple right to exercise human desires. The Islamic Republic has been repressing women for almost three decades now. Afghanistan, Sudan, Somalia, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia: we witness how women's oppression and terror against women is top priority for every Islamic regime, whatever its stripe.

Therefore: the veil is not merely a piece of cloth, but a political statement, the banner of a political movement, political Islam, in the Middle East, Europe and worldwide. We must take a firm stand against this by demanding secular laws, secular education and equality for all.

Religion must be privatised! Religion is a personal matter and should not be brought into everyday life. Criticising all religions is our right; freedom of expression should not be compromised



(Houzan Mahmoud pertence à Organisation of Women´s Freedom in Iraq e ao Partido Comunista dos Trabalhadores do Iraque.)

6 comentários :

Marco Oliveira disse...

Parece-me que o Straw acertou na mouche.
E torna-se óbvio que este é um assunto que deixa os muçulmanos divididos.

Repara neste artigo que saiu no Times: Why Muslim women should thank Straw. A autora, Saira Khan, escreve (entre outras coisas):

This is my message to British Muslim women — if you want your daughters to take advantage of all the opportunities that Britain has to offer, do not encourage them to wear the veil. We must unite against the radical Muslim men who would love women to be hidden, unseen and unheard.

Pedro Magalhães disse...

Excelente texto! Uma importante chamada de atenção para os perigos e hipocrisias do comunitarismo e do multiculturalismo!

Ricardo Alves disse...

Marco,
esse também é muito bom.
Essas mulheres têm que ser apoiadas...

Anónimo disse...

Será que custa muito fazer uma síntese para quem não sabe línguas?

Filipe Castro disse...

So acho engracado que ninguem fale da legislacao francesa como um exemplo a seguir. Alem disso acho hipocrisia falar so do Islao: em NY of judeus ortodoxos rapam a cabeca as mulheres e em Portugal a ICAR tenta a todo o custo impedir a educacao sexual nas escolas.

Acho fundamental que se implemente a separacao entre a igreja e o estado e posso concordar que se comesse com os muculmanos, mas em Portugal os evangelicos sao talvez mais perigosos que os muculmanos.

Filipe Castro disse...

eu escrevi "comesse"? :-)

Se tivermos de comer os muculmanos, parece que os mais saborosos sao os pequeninos e com asma. :-)