In 2005, Jamie Leigh Jones was working for a private contractor in Iraq when she was brutally gang-raped by coworkers. Four years later, Jamie is still being denied justice. Jamie can't file U.S. criminal charges because the rape took place overseas, and a fine-print clause in her contract takes away her right to file a lawsuit in the U.S. Why? Because big corporations, led by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, have worked for years to prevent workers from suing their employers in almost any circumstance, even sexual assault.
quarta-feira, 18 de novembro de 2009
Subscrever:
Enviar feedback
(
Atom
)
Mensagens
4 comentários :
Isso já mudou.
Com o voto contra de trinta e tal republicanos, incluindo MacCain, mas já mudou.
Desculpa, mudou apenas na medida em que existe agora uma lei segundo a qual o exército não faz contratos com empresas que exijam isso dos seus trabalhadores.
Estas podem continuar a fazer estes contratos, simplesmente não podem ganhar dinhero do governo norte-americano.
Mas a lei passou motivada precisamente por esse caso em particular.
João, esta situação não mudou. Este email é recente e foi enviado ontem pela MoveOn.org. Fica aqui o texto quase todo, com referências. Lê especialmente o quinto parágrafo:
In 2005, Jamie Leigh Jones was working for a private contractor in Iraq when she was brutally gang-raped by coworkers.1
Four years later, Jamie is still being denied justice.
Jamie can't file U.S. criminal charges because the rape took place overseas, and a fine-print clause in her contract takes
away her right to file a lawsuit in the U.S.2
Why? Because big corporations, led by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, have worked for years to prevent workers from suing
their employers in almost any circumstance, even sexual assault.3
The good news is that a bipartisan group in Congress is working to protect the rights of rape victims like Jamie. But,
shockingly, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce is fighting it.
They sent a letter to Congress saying that it would "set a dangerous precedent" to allow rape victims into court.4 The
worst news? The Chamber has enough clout to tie up the bill for years, unless we fight back.
Jamie Leigh Jones is not alone. Mary Beth Kineston was a truck driver with a private contractor in Iraq when she was
sexually assaulted by one coworker and groped by another. When Mary Beth complained to her supervisors, she was fired.
Like Jamie, Mary Beth was blocked from bringing charges in U.S. court.5
Workers who are sexually assaulted while working for defense contractors overseas typically have few options. They can't
bring charges in the country where the crime was committed, and they are blocked from U.S. courts as well. Their only
option is to go before a secretive, private panel where the process is heavily biased in favor of corporations.6
Jamie has teamed up with organizations like the National Alliance to End Sexual Violence, Public Citizen, and others to
end this injustice. Congress is considering an amendment to do just that, but they've run into a massive lobbying campaign
led by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.
The Chamber says it will "set a dangerous precedent" to allow these sexual assault victims to bring their cases to court.
Sources:
1. "Testimony of Jamie Leigh Jones to the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security,"
December 19, 2007
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=85228&id=17974-2354818-sIbZ99x&t=6 [www.moveon.org] [PDF]Â
"Testimony of Jamie Leigh Jones to the House Committee on Education and Labor Subcommittee on Health, Employment, Labor,
and Pensions," February 12, 2008
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=85227&id=17974-2354818-sIbZ99x&t=7 [www.moveon.org][LINK] [www.moveon.org] [video]
2. "Naked, Sore, Bruised, and Bleeding: Alleged U.S. Contractor Rape Victim Fights for her Day in Court," ABC News,
October 7, 2009
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=85229&id=17974-2354818-sIbZ99x&t=9 [www.moveon.org]
3. "Chamber Research Flawed; Empirical Studies Prove That Arbitration Harms Consumers," Public Citizen, July 29, 2008
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=85231&id=17974-2354818-sIbZ99x&t=10 [www.moveon.org]
"Letter in opposition to H.R. 3010, the 'Arbitration Fairness Act,' sent to House Subcommittee on Commercial and
Administrative Law," U.S. Chamber of Commerce, October 24, 2007
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=85233&id=17974-2354818-sIbZ99x&t=11 [www.moveon.org]
4. Letter Opposing the Jamie Leigh Jones Amendment, U.S. Chamber of Commerce, et al., October 6, 2009
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=85226&id=17974-2354818-sIbZ99x&t=12 [www.moveon.org]
5. "Limbo for U.S. Women Reporting Iraq Assaults," The New York Times, February 13, 2008
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=85225&id=17974-2354818-sIbZ99x&t=13 [www.moveon.org]
6. "Mandatory Arbitration Clauses: Undermining the Rights of Consumers, Employees, and Small Businesses," Fair Arbitration
Now, January 1, 2007
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=85230&id=17974-2354818-sIbZ99x&t=14 [www.moveon.org]
Filipe:
Já tinha conhecido essa situação há uns dias.
Aí está escrito: «The good news is that a bipartisan group in Congress is working to protect the rights of rape victims like Jamie.»
Isso era aquilo de que falava. MacCain e cerca de trinta senadores republicanos (nenhum democrata, tanto quanto sei) votaram contra, mas a proposta passou.
«But, shockingly, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce is fighting it.»
Sim, mas não pode fazer nada. As votações já aconteceram.
Enviar um comentário