sexta-feira, 28 de abril de 2006

Sam Harris: «The Myth of Secular Moral Chaos»

«One cannot criticize religious dogmatism for long without encountering the following claim, advanced as though it were a self-evident fact of nature: there is no secular basis for morality. Raping and killing children can only really be wrong, the thinking goes, if there is a God who says it is.
(...)
It is simply amazing how widespread this fear of secular moral chaos is, given how many misconceptions about morality and human nature are required to set it whirling in a person’s brain. There is undoubtedly much to be said against the spurious linkage between faith and morality, but the following three points should suffice.
1. If a book like the Bible were the only reliable blueprint for human decency that we had, it would be impossible (both practically and logically) to criticize it in moral terms. But it is extraordinarily easy to criticize the morality one finds in the Bible, as most of it is simply odious and incompatible with a civil society.
The notion that the Bible is a perfect guide to morality is really quite amazing, given the contents of the book. Human sacrifice, genocide, slaveholding, and misogyny are consistently celebrated.
(...)
Most Christians imagine that Jesus did away with all this barbarism and delivered a doctrine of pure love and toleration. He didn’t.
(...)
2. If religion were necessary for morality, there should be some evidence that atheists are less moral than believers.
(...)
While it is true that the regimes of Hitler, Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot were irreligious to varying degrees, they were not especially rational. In fact, their public pronouncements were little more than litanies of delusion —delusions about race, economics, national identity, the march of history, or the moral dangers of intellectualism.
(...)
Needless to say, a rational argument against religious faith is not an argument for the blind embrace of atheism as a dogma. (...) According to the United Nations’ Human Development Report (2005), the most atheistic societies—countries like Norway, Iceland, Australia, Canada, Sweden, Switzerland, Belgium, Japan, the Netherlands, Denmark, and the United Kingdom—are actually the healthiest, as indicated by measures of life expectancy, adult literacy, per-capita income, educational attainment, gender equality, homicide rate, and infant mortality. Conversely, the fifty nations now ranked lowest by the UN in terms of human development are unwaveringly religious.
(...)
3. If religion really provided the only conceivable objective basis for morality, it should be impossible to posit a nontheistic objective basis for morality. But it is not impossible; it is rather easy.
(...)
If there are objectively better and worse ways to live so as to maximize happiness in this world, these would be objective moral truths worth knowing. Whether we will ever be in a position to discover these truths and agree about them cannot be known in advance (and this is the case for all questions of scientific fact).
(...)
Incompatible religious doctrines have balkanized our world into separate moral communities, and these divisions have become a continuous source of human conflict. The idea that there is a necessary link between religious faith and morality is one of the principal myths keeping religion in good standing among otherwise reasonable men and women. (...)»

(Sam Harris na última Free Inquiry; ler na íntegra.)

6 comentários :

Anónimo disse...

Caro Ricardo Alves

Excelente escolha para o seu Blogue. Vou ler o texto na íntegra e apreciar os argumentos do autor.

Um abraço do

João Dias (sim, o tal...)

Anónimo disse...

I'm impressed with your site, very nice graphics!
»

Anónimo disse...

I love your website. It has a lot of great pictures and is very informative.
»

Anónimo disse...

Nice! Where you get this guestbook? I want the same script.. Awesome content. thankyou.
»

Anónimo disse...

Really amazing! Useful information. All the best.
»

Anónimo disse...

Very pretty site! Keep working. thnx!
»