quarta-feira, 24 de junho de 2009

o mistério do eco-cientista dogmático

«[...] At the European level, scientific assessments have found the risks Mon810 poses to the environment to be exceedingly small. Which is no surprise, perhaps, since study after study after study has concluded that the hazards—both to human and ecosystem health—are no greater with GE crops than with conventionally grown ones.

And yet throughout Europe, pubic opinion appears to be turning increasingly against GE crops. [...]

Most Europeans don’t consider themselves to be anti-science or particularly technophobic. In fact, Europe’s full embrace of the scientific consensus on another environmental issue, global warming, has enabled the continent to take the clear lead on climate change, with the most ambitious emissions targets, the first carbon trading market, and the greenest urban infrastructure plans on the planet.

Europe’s scientific disconnect is more broadly true of eco-minded citizens worldwide: They laud the likes of James Hansen and Rajendra Pachauri but shrink in horror at the scientist who offers up a Bt corn plant (even though numerous studies indicate that Bt crops—by dramatically curbing pesticide use—conserve biodiversity on farms and reduce chemical-related sickness among farmers).

So why the disconnect? Why do many environmentalists trust science when it comes to climate change but not when it comes to genetic engineering? Is the fear really about the technology itself or is it a mistrust of big agribusiness? [...]»


[Seed Magazine --- June 18, 2009]

5 comentários :

bckspc disse...

«In fact, Europe’s full embrace of the scientific consensus on another environmental issue, global warming, has enabled the continent to take the clear lead on climate change, with the most ambitious emissions targets, the first carbon trading market, and the greenest urban infrastructure plans on the planet.»

Ricardo:

É interessante citares isto. Subscreves?

Anónimo disse...

O facto de os EUA serem o maior produtor de OGM para consumo explica o excesso de zelo da União em proteger-nos de comida mais segura do que aquela que comemos...

ricardo s carvalho disse...

a questão climática é mais complexa do que essa frase. isso só salienta como os eco-cientistas são muitas vezes simplesmente eco-dogmáticos...

João Vasco disse...

Ricardo, não estou a perceber como é que essa frase salienta isso.

ricardo s carvalho disse...

não é a frase, é a atitude: questões científicas complexas tratadas levianamente por motivos "dogmáticos" (em muitos casos, políticos, na realidade).